Warning: Constant FS_CHMOD_DIR already defined in /home/digitalw/wrt120.digitalwcu.org/WeeklyBlogs/wp-config.php on line 101

Warning: Constant FS_CHMOD_FILE already defined in /home/digitalw/wrt120.digitalwcu.org/WeeklyBlogs/wp-config.php on line 101

Warning: Constant FS_CHMOD_DIR already defined in /home/digitalw/wrt120.digitalwcu.org/WeeklyBlogs/wp-config.php on line 101

Warning: Constant FS_CHMOD_FILE already defined in /home/digitalw/wrt120.digitalwcu.org/WeeklyBlogs/wp-config.php on line 101
Response to Olivia Vearling – Weekly Writing & Blogs

Response to Olivia Vearling

Today in the writing discussion about Paulo Freire’s “The Banking Concept of Education“, we discussed how each of us personally felt about Freire’s opinion on the education system. Olivia Vearling led this discussion and David Macmullen, Jeff Biancaniello, Maura Kelly, Makayla Medycki, Sam Zicorno, Cait Mangini, Laura McGroary, Seamus Corkery, Haley Clark, Amanda Regan, and I followed on September 5, 2019.

A point that was brought up was that teachers should make sure students are understanding what is being taught. A student should not be seen as a listening object. The reason the teachers are there is because the students make it possible for them to be. The teachers should care about what they are teaching, and it should not just be a narration. Narration is lifeless and adds to the process of memorization. The education system reminded everyone of a suppressed society and the teachers just force students to abide by their way of teaching. The teacher does not care about how the students need to learn. In this ‘banking’ education style, teachers only care about doing what is easiest and just lecturing to get it over with rather than actually caring if the students are gaining information.

Author: Gwendolyn Jordan

9:00 AM

css.php